web analytics

Reuters

  • Putin prepared to meet Zelenskiy but legitimacy an issue, Lavrov says

    Putin prepared to meet Zelenskiy but legitimacy an issue, Lavrov says

    Russian President Vladimir Putin is prepared to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy but all issues must be worked through first and there’s a question about Zelenskiy’s authority to sign a peace deal, Putin’s foreign minister said on Thursday.

    Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump met on Friday in Alaska for the first Russia-U.S. summit in more than four years and the two leaders discussed how to end the deadliest war in Europe since World War Two.

    After his summit talks in Alaska, Trump said on Monday he had begun arranging a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, to be followed by a trilateral summit with the U.S. president.

    Asked by reporters if Putin was willing to meet Zelenskiy, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said: “Our president has repeatedly said that he is ready to meet, including with Mr. Zelenskiy”.

    Lavrov, though, added a caveat: “With the understanding that all issues that require consideration at the highest level will be well worked out, and experts and ministers will prepare appropriate recommendations.

    “And, of course, with the understanding that when and if – hopefully, when – it comes to signing future agreements, the issue of the legitimacy of the person who signs these agreements from the Ukrainian side will be resolved,” Lavrov said.

    Putin has repeatedly raised doubts about Zelenskiy’s legitimacy as his term in office was due to expire in May 2024 but the war means no new presidential election has yet been held. Kyiv says Zelenskiy remains the legitimate president.

    Russian officials say they are worried that if Zelenskiy signs the deal then a future leader of Ukraine could contest it on the basis that Zelenskiy’s term had technically expired.

    Zelenskiy said this week Kyiv would like a “strong reaction” from Washington if Putin were not willing to sit down for a bilateral meeting with him.

    WAR OR PEACE?

    European leaders say they are sceptical that Putin is really interested in peace, but are searching for a credible way to ensure Ukraine’s security as part of a potential peace deal with minimal U.S. involvement.

    Lavrov said it was clear that neither Ukraine nor European leaders wanted peace. He accused the so-called “coalition of the willing” – which includes major European powers such as Britain, France, Germany and Italy – of trying to undermine the progress made in Alaska.

    “They are not interested in a sustainable, fair, long-term settlement,” Lavrov said of Ukraine. He said the Europeans were interested in achieving the strategic defeat of Russia.

    “European countries followed Mr. Zelenskiy to Washington and tried to advance their agenda there, which aims to ensure that security guarantees are based on the logic of isolating Russia,” Lavrov said, referring to Monday’s gathering of Trump, Zelenskiy and the leaders of major European powers at the White House.

    Lavrov said the best option for a security guarantee for Ukraine would be based on discussions that took place between Moscow and Kyiv in Istanbul in 2022.

    Under a draft of that document which Reuters has seen, Ukraine was asked to agree to permanent neutrality in return for international security guarantees from the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council: Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States.

    Any attempts to depart from the failed Istanbul discussions would be hopeless, Lavrov said.

    At the time, Kyiv rejected that proposal on the grounds that Moscow would have held effective veto power over any military response to come to its aid.

  • Netanyahu says Israel to resume Gaza negotiations to end war and free hostages

    Netanyahu says Israel to resume Gaza negotiations to end war and free hostages

    CAIRO/JERUSALEM: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday that Israel would immediately resume negotiations for the release of all hostages held in Gaza and an end to the nearly two-year-old war but on terms acceptable to Israel.

    It was Netanyahu’s first response to a temporary ceasefire proposal put forward by Egypt and Qatar that Hamas accepted on Monday. Israel will dispatch negotiators to talks once a location is set, an Israeli official said.

    Speaking to soldiers near Israel’s border with Gaza, Netanyahu said he was still set on approving plans for defeating Hamas and capturing Gaza City, the densely populated centre at the heart of the Palestinian enclave.

    Thousands of Palestinians have left their homes as Israeli tanks have edged closer to Gaza City over the last 10 days.

    “At the same time I have issued instructions to begin immediate negotiations for the release of all our hostages and an end to the war on terms acceptable to Israel,” he said, adding: “We are in the decision-making phase.”

    Israel’s plan to seize Gaza City was approved this month by the security cabinet, which Netanyahu chairs, even though many of Israel’s closest allies have urged the government to reconsider.

    His latest remarks underscore the Israeli government view that any deal ensures the release of all 50 hostages captured in Israel in October 2023 and still held by militants in Gaza. Israeli officials believe around 20 are still alive.

    The proposal on the table calls for a 60-day ceasefire and the release of 10 living hostages held in Gaza by Hamas militants and of 18 bodies. In turn, Israel would release about 200 long-serving Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.

    Once the temporary ceasefire begins, the proposal is for Hamas and Israel to begin negotiations on a permanent ceasefire that would include the return of the remaining hostages.

    PALESTINIAN PROTESTS

    In a sign of growing despair at conditions in Gaza, residents staged a rare show of protest against the war on Thursday.

    Carrying banners reading “Save Gaza, enough” and “Gaza is dying by the killing, hunger and oppression,” hundreds of people rallied in Gaza City in a march organised by several civil unions.

    “This is for a clear message: words are finished, and the time has come for action to stop the military operations, to stop the genocide against our people and to stop the massacres taking place daily,” said Palestinian journalist Tawfik Abu Jarad during the protest.

    The Gaza health ministry said at least 70 people had been killed in Israeli fire in the enclave in the past 24 hours, including eight people in a house in Sabra suburb in Gaza City.

    A statement from the Palestinian Fatah movement said one of those killed in Sabra was a Fatah leader and former militant, along with seven members of his family. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military.

    CEASEFIRE OR CAPTURE OF GAZA CITY?

    Even as the military begins its preparations to launch the assault on Gaza City, Israeli officials have indicated that there is time for a ceasefire to be reached.

    On Wednesday, the military called up 60,000 reservists in a sign the government was pressing ahead with the plan, despite international condemnation. Such a call-up is likely to take weeks.

    Netanyahu is under pressure from some far-right members of his coalition to reject a temporary ceasefire and instead to continue the war and pursue the annexation of the territory.

    Some Palestinian families in Gaza City have left for shelters along the coast, while others have moved to central and southern parts of the enclave, according to residents there.

    “We are facing a bitter, bitter situation, to die at home or leave and die somewhere else. As long as this war continues, survival is uncertain,” said Rabah Abu Elias, 67, a father of seven.

    “In the news, they speak about a possible truce, on the ground, we only hear explosions and see deaths. To leave Gaza City or not isn’t an easy decision to make,” he told Reuters by phone.

    On Thursday, Israeli military spokesperson Avichay Adraee wrote on X that the military had started making what he said were initial warning calls to medical and international organisations operating in Gaza’s north, telling them that Gaza City residents should start to prepare to move out of the city and towards the south.

    Adraee shared a recording of what he said was an Israeli officer telling a Gazan health ministry official that hospitals in southern Gaza should also prepare to receive patients from medical facilities in the north, who will be forced to evacuate.

    A Gaza health ministry official confirmed the phone call had taken place. The ministry rejected the Israeli request to shift medical resources south, warning it would cripple the already devastated health system and endanger over a million residents. It urged international bodies to intervene and protect lifesaving care.

    Two more people have died of starvation and malnutrition in Gaza in the past 24 hours, the ministry said on Thursday. The new deaths raised the number of Palestinians who have died from such causes to 271, including 112 children, since the war began.

  • Masimo sues US Customs over approval of Apple Watch imports

    Masimo sues US Customs over approval of Apple Watch imports

    WASHINGTON: Medical monitoring technology company Masimo sued US Customs and Border Protection on Wednesday over a decision by the agency that allowed Apple to import Apple Watches with blood-oxygen reading technology during a patent dispute between the companies.

    Masimo said in the lawsuit in Washington, D.C., federal court that Customs improperly determined that Apple can import watches with pulse oximetry technology, reversing its own decision from last year without notifying Masimo.

    Masimo told the court that it learned of the agency’s August 1 decision only after Apple announced it would reintroduce blood-oxygen reading to its watches last week.
    Spokespeople for Apple and Customs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A Masimo spokesperson declined to comment.

    Irvine, California-based Masimo has accused Apple of hiring away its employees and stealing its pulse oximetry technology to use in its Apple Watches. Masimo has separately sued Apple for patent infringement and trade secret theft in ongoing federal court cases.

    Masimo convinced the U.S. International Trade Commission to block imports of Apple’s Series 9 and Ultra 2 smartwatches in 2023 based on a determination that Apple’s technology for reading blood oxygen levels infringed Masimo’s patents.

    Apple has continued to sell Customs-approved redesigned watches without pulse oximetry since the ITC’s decision.

    Apple said on Aug. 14 that it would reintroduce its smartwatches’ blood-oxygen reading capabilities with approval from Customs. Masimo said the agency’s decision to approve the watches without input from Masimo or any “meaningful justification” deprived the company of its rights.

    “CBP’s function is to enforce ITC exclusion orders, not to create loopholes that render them ineffective,” Masimo said.

    Masimo asked the Washington court to halt the agency’s ruling and continue to block Apple from selling watches with the blood-oxygen feature.

  • ESPN launches all-in-one streaming service

    ESPN launches all-in-one streaming service

    Walt Disney’s ESPN will deliver its full range of sports programming outside of pay TV for the first time starting on Thursday, when the network debuts an app designed to be a hub for live games and personalized news, stats and highlights.

    The ESPN app is Disney’s effort to capture some of the tens of millions of customers that the pioneering sports channel has lost since 2010 during the streaming TV revolution.

    ESPN executives said they have tailored the new offering, which is far broader than the limited ESPN+ app launched in 2018, to cater to the tastes of today’s sports fans.

    “We know that fans don’t just want to watch,” ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro told reporters. “They want an experience. They want to interact.”

    The app will offer more than 47,000 live events each year from the NFL, NBA, WNBA, NHL, college football, tennis, golf and other sports.

    It will cost $30 per month. An introductory offer will include ad-supported versions of the Disney+ and Hulu streaming services for free.

    Fans can enter their favorite teams and sports for customization such as a personalized version of the “SportsCenter” news and recap show.

    Artificial intelligence will generate narration based on the voices of ESPN anchors.

    A new feature called “Verts,” or scroll-ready, vertical video highlights, also can be tailored. Stats for a user’s fantasy players will be displayed next to live games. And an ESPN Bet tab will show live, settled and upcoming bets for users who have linked their betting accounts.

    Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger has called the app “a sports fan’s dream.”

    Industry analysts see it as a chance for the company to pick up fans who do not subscribe to cable, and they do not expect it will pull masses from pay TV.

    ESPN was available in 100 million homes through pay TV in 2010. In July of this year, that number stood at about 61 million.

    “It’s another step in Disney’s pivot to (streaming) and the importance to streaming to the overall company,” said MoffettNathanson analyst Robert Fishman.

    ESPN will promote the app extensively. Actor John Cena will star in commercials that stress “All of ESPN. All in One Place.”

    Pay television will “remain a big part” of ESPN’s business, Pitaro said. For the quarter that ended in June, ESPN accounted for $1 billion of Disney’s $4.6 billion in operating income, or nearly 22%. Most of ESPN’s revenue came from fees paid by cable and satellite distributors and from advertising.

    Subscribers to pay TV will have access to the new ESPN app. Pitaro said the company hoped to drive all of its customers to the app “because that’s by far the best, the most holistic experience.”

  • US issues sanctions on networks, vessels for dealing in Iran oil

    US issues sanctions on networks, vessels for dealing in Iran oil

    The Trump administration on Thursday issued more Iran-related sanctions, targeting 13 entities based in Hong Kong, China, the United Arab Emirates and the Marshall Islands, as well as eight vessels, the U.S. Treasury Department said.

    The measures cover Greek national Antonios Margaritis and his network of companies and vessels that Treasury said was involved in transporting Iranian oil exports in violation of sanctions.

    Treasury also designated Ares Shipping Limited in Hong Kong, Comford Management in the Marshall Islands and Hong Kong Hangshun Shipping Limited in Hong Kong.

    Designated crude oil tankers include Panama-flagged vessels Adeline G and Kongm, and Lafit under the flag of Sao Tome and Principe.

    The State Department separately said it imposed sanctions on two China-based operators of oil-related terminals and storage. It said they handled imports of Iranian oil aboard tankers previously targeted by U.S. sanctions.

    The firms were identified as Qingdao Port Haiye Dongjiakou Oil Products Co in Shandong province and Yangshan Shengang International Petroleum Storage and Transportation Co in Zhejiang province.

    Iran suspended talks with Washington aimed at curbing the Islamic Republic’s nuclear ambitions after the U.S. and Israel struck its nuclear sites in June. Iran denies any intent to develop atomic bombs.

    Iran’s top diplomat said on Wednesday that the moment for “effective” nuclear talks with the United States has not yet arrived, adding that Iran would not completely cut off cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog.

  • Putin’s demand to Ukraine: give up Donbas, no NATO and no Western troops, sources say

    Putin’s demand to Ukraine: give up Donbas, no NATO and no Western troops, sources say

    MOSCOW: Vladimir Putin is demanding that Ukraine give up all of the eastern Donbas region, renounce ambitions to join NATO, remain neutral and keep Western troops out of the country, three sources familiar with top-level Kremlin thinking told Reuters.

    The Russian president met Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday for the first Russia-U.S. summit in more than four years and spent almost all of their three-hour closed meeting discussing what a compromise on Ukraine might look like, according to the sources who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.

    Speaking afterwards beside Trump, Putin said the meeting would hopefully open up the road to peace in Ukraine – but neither leader gave specifics about what they discussed.

    In the most detailed Russian-based reporting to date on Putin’s offer at the summit, Reuters was able to outline the contours of what the Kremlin would like to see in a possible peace deal to end a war that has killed and injured hundreds of thousands of people.

    In essence, the Russian sources said, Putin has compromised on territorial demands he laid out in June 2024, which required Kyiv to cede the entirety of the four provinces Moscow claims as part of Russia: Dontesk and Luhansk in eastern Ukraine – which make up the Donbas – plus Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in the south.

    Kyiv rejected those terms as tantamount to surrender.

    In his new proposal, the Russian president has stuck to his demand that Ukraine completely withdraw from the parts of the Donbas it still controls, according to the three sources. In return, though, Moscow would halt the current front lines in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, they added.

    Russia controls about 88% of the Donbas and 73% of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, according to U.S. estimates and open-source data.

    Moscow is also willing to hand over the small parts of the Kharkiv, Sumy, and Dnipropetrovsk regions of Ukraine it controls as part of a possible deal, the sources said.

    Putin is sticking, too, to his previous demands that Ukraine give up its NATO ambitions and for a legally binding pledge from the U.S.-led military alliance that it will not expand further eastwards, as well as for limits on the Ukrainian army and an agreement that no Western troops will be deployed on the ground in Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping force, the sources said.

    Yet the two sides remain far apart, more than three years after Putin ordered thousands of Russian troops into Ukraine in a full-scale invasion that followed the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and prolonged fighting in the country’s east between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian troops.

    Ukraine’s foreign ministry had no immediate comment on the proposals.

    President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has repeatedly dismissed the idea of withdrawing from internationally recognised Ukrainian land as part of a deal, and has said the industrial Donbas region serves as a fortress holding back Russian advances deeper into Ukraine.

    “If we’re talking about simply withdrawing from the east, we cannot do that,” he told reporters in comments released by Kyiv on Thursday. “It is a matter of our country’s survival, involving the strongest defensive lines.”

    Joining NATO, meanwhile, is a strategic objective enshrined in the country’s constitution and one which Kyiv sees as its most reliable security guarantee. Zelenskiy said it was not up to Russia to decide on the alliance’s membership.

    The White House and NATO didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the Russian proposals.

    Political scientist Samuel Charap, chair in Russia and Eurasia Policy at RAND, a U.S.-based global policy think-tank, said any requirement for Ukraine to withdraw from the Donbas remained a non-starter for Kyiv, both politically and strategically.

    “Openness to ‘peace’ on terms categorically unacceptable to the other side could be more of a performance for Trump than a sign of a true willingness to compromise,” he added. “The only way to test that proposition is to begin a serious process at the working level to hash out those details.”

    TRUMP: PUTIN WANTS TO SEE IT ENDED

    Russian forces currently control a fifth of Ukraine, an area about the size of the American state of Ohio, according to U.S. estimates and open-source maps.

    The three sources close to the Kremlin said the summit in the Alaskan city of Anchorage had ushered in the best chance for peace since the war began because there had been specific discussions about Russia’s terms and Putin had shown a willingness to give ground.

    “Putin is ready for peace – for compromise. That is the message that was conveyed to Trump,” one of the people said.

    The sources cautioned that it was unclear to Moscow whether Ukraine would be prepared to cede the remains of the Donbas, and that if it did not then the war would continue. Also unclear was whether or not the United States would give any recognition to Russian-held Ukrainian territory, they added.

    A fourth source said that though economic issues were secondary for Putin, he understood the economic vulnerability of Russia and the scale of the effort needed to go far further into Ukraine.

    Trump has said he wants to end the “bloodbath” of the war and be remembered as a “peacemaker president”. He said on Monday he had begun arranging, opens new tab a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, to be followed by a trilateral summit with the U.S. president.

    “I believe Vladimir Putin wants to see it ended,” Trump said beside Zelenskiy in the Oval office. “I feel confident we are going to get it solved.”

    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Thursday that Putin was prepared to meet Zelenskiy but that all issues had to be worked through first and there was a question about Zelenskiy’s authority to sign a peace deal.

    Putin has repeatedly raised doubts about Zelenskiy’s legitimacy as his term in office was due to expire in May 2024 but the war means no new presidential election has yet been held. Kyiv says Zelenskiy remains the legitimate president.

    The leaders of Britain, France and Germany have said they are sceptical that Putin wants to end the war.

    SECURITY GUARANTEES FOR UKRAINE

    Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff was instrumental in paving the way for the summit and the latest drive for peace, according to two of the Russian sources.

    Witkoff met Putin in the Kremlin on August 6 with Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov. At the meeting, Putin conveyed clearly to Witkoff that he was ready to compromise and set out the contours of what he could accept for peace, according to two Russian sources.

    If Russia and Ukraine could reach an agreement, then there are various options for a formal deal – including a possible three-way Russia-Ukraine-U.S. deal that is recognised by the U.N. Security Council, one of the sources said.

    Another option is to go back to the failed 2022 Istanbul agreements, where Russia and Ukraine discussed Ukraine’s permanent neutrality in return for security guarantees from the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council: Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, the sources added.

    “There are two choices: war or peace, and if there is no peace, then there is more war,” one of the people said.

  • UK PM Keir Starmer faces criticism as asylum claims hit record

    UK PM Keir Starmer faces criticism as asylum claims hit record

    LONDON: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer faced renewed criticism over his immigration policies on Thursday after new official figures showed asylum-seeker claims hitting a record high, with more migrants being housed in hotels compared with a year ago.

    According to a regular tracker of voters’ concerns, immigration has overtaken the economy as the biggest issue amid anger over the record numbers of asylum seekers arriving in small boats across the Channel, including more than 27,000 this year.

    The populist Reform Party, which advocates the deportation of “illegal immigrants”, is now comfortably leading in the polls, putting Starmer, who has promised to cut net immigration, under increasing pressure to tackle the issue.

    However, earlier this week the government was dealt a blow when a council to the northeast of London won a temporary injunction to stop asylum seekers from being housed in a hotel where protests had erupted after one resident was charged with sexual assault.

    Other councils have indicated they would also seek similar court orders, while Reform leader Nigel Farage has called for more protests.

    “Labour has lost control of our borders and they’re engulfed in a migration crisis,” said Chris Philp, the home affairs spokesman for the main opposition Conservative Party.

    The new migration data showed more than 32,000 asylum seekers were housed in hotels in Britain at the end of June this year, an increase of 8% from the year before.

    However, the total figure of just over 32,000 was 43% lower than the peak of 56,042 recorded in September 2023, and slightly down compared with the previous quarterly figures in March.

    The figures also showed 111,000 people had claimed asylum in the year to June, up 14% from the previous year and surpassing the previous peak of 103,000 recorded in 2002.

    Home Secretary (interior minister) Yvette Cooper said overall the figures showed their policies have been working since Labour took office last year, pointing to a 30% increase in the returns of failed asylum seekers.

    “We inherited a broken immigration and asylum system that the previous government left in chaos,” she said in a statement.

    “Since coming to office we have strengthened Britain’s visa and immigration controls, cut asylum costs and sharply increased enforcement and returns, as today’s figures show.”

    The numbers arriving on small boats – up 38% in the year to June – have become the focal point for the migration issue. Critics say the public are at risk from thousands of young men coming to Britain, while pro-migrant groups say the issue is being used by far right groups to exploit tensions.

    The latest figures showed of the almost 160,000 people who had arrived on small boats and claimed asylum since 2018, 61,706 had been granted some form of protection status.

    Nationals from Afghanistan, Eritrea and Iran made up the largest number of such arrivals in the year to June.

    While the data showed overall enforced returns were 25% higher in the year to June than the previous year, it also said since 2018 only 6,313 people who arrived by small boat had been returned, 4% of the total number of such arrivals.

  • Dakota Johnson digs deep to deliver energy for movie ‘Splitsville’

    Dakota Johnson digs deep to deliver energy for movie ‘Splitsville’

    For Dakota Johnson, it was important to showcase both her acting and producing talents for the romantic comedy film “Splitsville.”

    “I’m more valuable, I think, on set and in post (production), because I know the beat, like the heartbeat of the film while we’re making it,” Johnson told Reuters.

    Dakota Johnson- All News and Updates

    “I’m good at helping on set. And then in post, I’m good at remembering the energy of what it felt like while we were filming so I can implement that in the edit,” the “Fifty Shades of Grey” actor added.

    “Splitsville,” distributed by Neon, will arrive in theaters on Friday.

    The film focuses on two couples. Johnson plays a woman named Julie who is married to Paul, portrayed by the movie’s director Michael Angelo Covino.

    Another couple, Ashley and Carey, is played by Adria Arjona and Kyle Marvin.

    The film follows Ashley, who tells her husband Carey she wants a divorce to be free.

    Carey runs to his best friend Paul, who reveals he and his wife Julie are in an open relationship, and things get complicated between the four of them when Carey and Julie sleep together.

    “I would say it’s not so much about adulting. I would say it’s more about, like, emotional development, like arrested development,” Johnson said, referring to the way each character acts.

    “Especially in men, I think it’s emotional intelligence versus arrested development,” she said.

    Covino said he felt Dakota was perfect for the role from the get-go.

    “We wrote the role for her,” he said.

    “She’s wildly funny and doesn’t get to flex it as much as I would like to see on camera,” Covino added.

  • Americans worry democracy in danger amid gerrymandering fights, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

    Americans worry democracy in danger amid gerrymandering fights, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

    Most Americans believe that efforts to redraw U.S. House of Representatives districts to maximize partisan gains, like those under way in Texas and California, are bad for democracy, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found.

    More than half of respondents — 57% — said they feared that American democracy itself was in danger, a view held by eight in 10 Democrats and four in 10 in President Donald Trump’s Republican Party

    The six-day survey of 4,446 U.S. adults, which closed on Monday, showed deep unease with the growing political divisions in Washington — where Republicans control both chambers of Congress — and state capitals.

    The poll found that 55% of respondents, including 71% of Democrats and 46% of Republicans, agreed that ongoing redistricting plans – such as those hatched by governors in Texas and California in a process known as gerrymandering – were “bad for democracy.”

    At Trump’s urging, Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott has called a special session of the state legislature to redraw the state’s congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, aiming to help Republicans defend their 219-212 U.S. House majority.

    Incumbent presidents’ parties typically lose House seats in midterms, which can block their legislative agendas and in Trump’s first term led to two impeachment probes.

    California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, a White House hopeful in 2028, has threatened to try to redraw his state’s district map in response, adding five Democratic seats to offset Republicans’ expected Texas gains.

    The practice is not new but has gained attention because it is happening mid-decade rather than following a census. It has meant that the vast majority of House races are not competitive in general elections; in recent decades about two-thirds of them were won by more than 20 percentage points.

    As president, Trump has flouted democratic norms with steps including directing the U.S. Justice Department to pursue his political adversaries, pressuring the independent Federal Reserve to lower rates and seizing control of Washington, D.C.’s police force.

    In interviews, Texas Republicans who participated in the poll largely supported the state’s potential redistricting, while Democrats described it as “cheating” but supported the idea of Democratic states trying to respond in kind.

    The poll had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points when describing the views of all Americans and about 3 points for the views of Republicans and Democrats.

    ‘SHADY BUSINESS’

    Amanda Kelley, 51, an insurance fraud investigator in Dallas, was the rare Republican to criticize the Texas effort.

    “I don’t like it when either side tries to do that. I think that’s shady business,” Kelley said. “The optics of it happening in the middle of the term when you would draw district lines, that leaves kind of a bad taste in my mouth.”

    Paul Wehrmann, 57, an attorney in Dallas who described himself as an independent voter, also opposed it.

    “It’s unfair, and it sets a bad precedent,” said Wehrmann, who worries it could spiral into states redrawing maps every election cycle instead of every decade. Partisan gerrymandering “is bad all around, but I think that it is fair for Democrats to try to counterbalance what Republicans are doing.

    “They need to stop bringing a knife to a gunfight.”

    Americans of both parties have long disliked elected leaders of the rival party, but the Reuters/Ipsos poll found that they also distrust regular people who align with the opposing party.

    Some 55% of Democrats agreed with a statement that “people who are Republican are NOT to be trusted,” while 32% disagreed. Republicans were split, with 43% agreeing that Democrats were untrustworthy and 44% saying they disagreed.

    The poll also showed politics weighing more on people’s everyday lives than in past years, particularly among Democrats. Some 27% of Democrats said last year’s presidential election has negatively affected their friendships.

    A Reuters/Ipsos poll in April 2017, early in Trump’s first term, showed a smaller share of Democrats – 18% – reported fraying friendships because of the election. Only 10% of Republicans said this month that politics weighed on their friendships, largely unchanged from 2017.

    Jeffrey Larson, a 64-year-old toxicologist and Republican voter in Seabrook, Texas, said he and his wife, a Democrat, agreed not to discuss politics.

    “I might not agree with what the Democrats are doing, but I don’t think that they’re trying to specifically destroy my life or destroy America,” Larson said.

    Close to half of Democrats – or 46% – said their party had lost its way, compared to 19% of Republicans who said the same of their party.

    Sandy Ogden, 71, a tech executive from Sunnyvale, California and self-described Democrat, said she faulted her party’s leaders.

    “I think the Democratic Party members are united in what we believe, but the leaders are ineffective in mounting an opposition that works,” Ogden said.

    Analysts said that ordinary Democrats’ greater mistrust of Republicans and friction with friends suggests a reluctance among Democrats to engage with Republicans that could harm the party’s chances at regaining political standing.

    “Democracy involves a willingness to allow people with differing views to express those views,” said Whit Ayres, a veteran Republican pollster.

    Michael Ceraso, a longtime Democratic operative, found the poll results frustrating.

    “The majority of Democrats believe our democracy is failing and nearly half of them don’t want to talk to the opposition party,” Ceraso said. “We have to be better.”

  • Gold holds steady as investors strap in for Jackson Hole gathering

    Gold holds steady as investors strap in for Jackson Hole gathering

    Washington: Gold prices were steady on Thursday as investors awaited U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s speech at the Jackson Hole symposium on Friday for signals on the central bank’s policy direction.

    Spot gold fell 0.1% to $3,342.25 per ounce, as of 11:33 a.m. ET (1533 GMT). U.S. gold futures for December delivery were largely steady at $3,386.50.

    The U.S. dollar index (.DXY), opens new tab was up 0.4%, making U.S. dollar-priced gold expensive for overseas buyers.

    Powell is expected to speak at the Jackson Hole conference about the economic outlook and the Fed’s policy stance.

    “If (Powell) signals a rate decrease in September, I don’t think much will happen because the market is already expecting that,” said Marex analyst Edward Meir.

    “If he says we may decrease rates again in October, November or December, I think the dollar could weaken and gold could push higher,” Meir added.

    Non-yielding gold typically performs well in a low-interest-rate environment.

    The Fed has kept rates unchanged since December, but traders see a 71% chance of a quarter-point cut by September, according to CME’s FedWatch tool.

    Minutes from the Fed’s July meeting showed that Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller were the only officials pushing for a rate cut, dissenting from the decision to hold rates steady.

    Meanwhile, Fitch Solutions’ research company BMI on Wednesday revised its 2025 gold price forecast upward by $150 to $3,250 per ounce.

    “Prices will remain elevated in the coming weeks as the market braces for a U.S. Fed rate cut in September. Even then, we believe the upside for gold following the rate cut will be limited with most of it already priced in,” BMI said in a note.